- Houraney.com - http://houraney.com -

The Marketing of Evil

The Marketing of Evil – Synopsis

How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom

by David Kupelian

– Reviews –

[1]The marketing of evil is a serious wake-up call for all who cherish traditional values innocence of children and the very existence of our great country – Dr. Laura Schlesinger

The marketers of people will always show you something destructive – with catastrophic results. Kupelian shines a light on them all. Now watch the cockroaches run for cover – Michelle Malkin

If you want to know how such a thoroughly decent country as America could go wrong so fast, you simply have to read The Marketing of Evil – Hal Lindsay

David Kupelian brilliantly explains how a clever, radical elite is persuading Americans to accept people as good, and good as evil. – Robert Knight

Kupelian reveals how ignorant some people cost us our lives, allies of our loved ones, and the life of our nation. – Judith A. Reisman PhD

–  Introduction  –

…within the space of our lifetimes, much of what Americans once almost universally abhorred has been packaged, perfumed, gift wrap, and sold to us as though it had great value. By skillfully playing on our deeply felt natural values of fairness, generosity, intolerance, these marketers have persuaded us to embrace as enlightened and noble that which all previous generations since America’s founding regarded as grossly self-destructive – in a word, evil.

America was actually sold on abortion rights to an audacious, calculated, and brazenly deceptive public relations plan that relied heavily on lies and fabrications – as the campaign’s cofounder confesses in these pages.

Few of us realize that the widely revered father of the “sexual revolution” has been irrefutably exposed as a full-fledged sexual psychopath who encouraged pedophilia and whose vaunted “scientific surveys” included interviewing incarcerated sex offenders and prostitutes and pretending they were typical World War II era Americans. Or that the “gay rights” movement – which transformed America’s former view of homosexuals as self-destructive “deviants” into their current status as victims and cultural heroes – is following an in-depth, published plan laid out by professional Harvard trained marketers.

How can this be happening in America? How this child molesting become “man-boy love”? How does crushing a baby’s skull and sucking out his brains become a “constitutional right”? How does quoting the Bible become “hate speech”? How exactly is evil made to appear good, and good made to appear evil?

If we don’t understand what the marketers of evil in this world doing – and especially if we don’t copy and our own inherent flaws that allow us to be conned – our fate is already sealed. But when we finally come to understand, with crystal clarity, the subtotal seductions and bold manipulations that have led our culture into captivity, the spell is broken and we are free.

It’s that simple. If we know the marketer is a con man, we just tell him to get lost.

We’ll start our exploration of the marketing of evil but one of today’s most successful in intimidating public relation campaigns – the selling of homosexuality to America. The explanations by “gay rights” marketers of their own tactics of mass manipulation is so amazingly clear and brazen that they will enhance your understanding of all that follows throughout the book.

So let us begin our journey…

Chapter 1: Marketing Blitz – Selling “gay rights” to America.

It grew out of the “sexual liberation” movement of the 1960s. To be precise, June 11, 1969, “Stonewall riot” – when a group of homosexuals at New York City’s Stonewall Inn resisted police commands to disperse – is widely regarded as a bird of the “gay liberation” movement.

This emerging political force made considerable strides during the 70s, most notably in persuading – many say intimidating – the American psychiatric Association in 1973 into removing homosexuality from its official list of mental disorders.

“Equality for gays” was not yet a phrase that reverberated in the hearts and minds of Americans.

Then came a AIDS.

As a public relations matter, AIDS was daunting. This modern plague, if not handled brilliantly in the court of public opinion, could result in homosexuals being widely shunned.

The movement that only needed help. A new direction would somehow have to convert the fearsome AIDS epidemic from a negative into a positive. What was needed was a comprehensive, long-term upward relations campaign that had to be brilliantly conceived and skillfully executed.

In February 1988 some 175 leading activists representing homosexual groups across the nation held a war conference in Washington, Virginia, to map out the movements future. Shortly thereafter, activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen put into book form a comprehensive populations claimed they had been advocating with their day – rights peers for several years.

Kirk and Madsen’s “war goal,” explains marketing expert Paul Rondeau of Regent University, was to “force acceptance of homosexual culture into the mainstream, to silence opposition, and ultimately to convert American society.”

Their book After the Ball became the public relations “Bible” of the movement. ‘We can change what people actually think and feel by breaking their current negative associations with our cause and replacing them with positive associations.’

Simple case in point: homosexual activists called a movement “gay rights.” This accomplishes two major objectives: (1) – use of the word gay rather than homosexual masks the controversial sexual behavior involved and accentuates instead a vague but positive sounding cultural identity – gay, which after which after all, once met “happy”: and (2) – describing their battle from the get go as one over “rights” implies homosexuals are being denied their basic freedoms of citizens that others enjoy.

So merely by using the term gay rights, and persuading politicians and the media to adopt his terminology, activists seeking to transform America have framed the terms of the debate in their favor almost before the contest begins. (And in public relations warfare, he who frames the terms of the debate almost always wins. The abortion-rights movement has a bell in their war decisive because it succeeded, early on, in framing the debate as a question, not of abortion, but of choice. The abortion vanguard correctly anticipated that it would be far easier to defend an abstract, positive – sounding idea like choice than the unrestricted slaughter of unborn babies.)

Okay, you might be wondering, even granting the movements cutting – edge marketing savvy, how do you sell middle America on those 500 sex partners and weird sexual practices? Answer, according to Kirk and Madsen, you don’t. Just don’t talk about it. Rather, look and act as normal as possible for the camera. “When you’re very different, and people hate you for it,” they explain, “this is what you do: first you get a foot in the door, by being as similar as possible; then, and only then – when you’re one little difference is finally accepted – can you start dragging in your other peculiarities, one by one. You hammer in the wedge narrow end first. As the saying goes, allow the camel’s nose beneath the tent, and soon his whole body will soon follow.”

In other words, sadomasochists, leather fetishists, cross – dresses, transgenders, and other “peculiar” members of the homosexual community need to keep away from the tent and out of sight while the sales job is under way. Later, once again was safely inside, there will be room for all.

Manipulating the emotions met by restructuring the thoughts and beliefs of large numbers of people is what modern marketing is all about. “Structuring the consciousness” of others. (Otherwise known as ‘brainwashing’ is the technique that shaped the minds and attitudes of Americans into accepting an otherwise unacceptable and despicable behavior.)

–  The Road to Conversion  –

Jamming,” explains Rondeau, “is psychological terrorism meant to silence expression or even support for dissenting opinion.”

Consciously or not, the media were following Kirk and Madsen’s playbook to the letter, discrediting anyone who disagreed with the homosexual agenda by associating them with lowlife murderers.

Kirk and Madsen announced quietly:

“..we need conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, to a playing psychological attack, in the form of propaganda and intimidation via the media. We mean “subverting” the mechanism of prejudice to our own ends – using the very processes that made America a guest to turn their hatred into warm regard – whether they like it or not.”

Transforming another person’s hatred into love (warm regard) is the object of classic brainwashing.

“It makes no difference that the ads are lies,” write Kirk and Madsen, “not to us, because we’re using them to ethically good effect, to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies, and far more wicked ones.”

The strategy is to jam homo-hatred by linking it to the Nazi horror. Kirk and Madsen explain the leverage gained by this nasty technique:

“Most contemporary hate groups on the religious right will bitterly resent the implied connection between Homo hatred and Nazi patches. But since they can’t defend the latter, I’ll end up having to distance themselves by insisting that they would never go to such extremes. Such declarations of civility toward gays, of course, set out worst detractors on the slippery slope toward recognition of fundamental gay rights.”

But this is not about truth. It’s about manipulation. They use emotional threads to tie their “product” (in this case, homosexuality) to pre-existing positive attributes in the consumers mind. And in a cultural political campaign like this, they also successfully tie all who oppose their agenda to pre-existing negatives, such as Nazis. The net effect of this conditioning can be so powerful over time and ultimately one’s prior beliefs – based on experience, religious training, conscience, and common sense – are overwhelmed and replaced as a result of successive waves of emotion – driven reprogramming.

Still, one wonders how the press could allow itself to be used in such a blatantly propagandistic way and in pursuit of such a subversive agenda. And make no mistake, the “gay rights” agenda, which includes indoctrinating kindergartners with pro-homosexual propaganda and legalizing same – sex marriage, is extraordinarily subversive to America’s foundational values and institutions. For the answer to that question you have to realize what’s happened to the news media in recent years.

Indeed, part of the mobilization that occurred in the wake of the 1988 ‘War Conference’ was a recognition that the news media represented the prime tool for changing the hearts and minds of Americans. That’s 1990s saw the launch of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association, which has since grown into a formidable organization. Whereas 50 years ago a news story portraying homosexuality is normal and respectable was unheard of, now we’re facing exactly the opposite spectacle.

Thus a lot of credit for the “gay – ing of America” can be laid at the door of the news media who, intentionally or not, have worked in tandem with the movement’s public-relations machinery for years.

–  We Forgot One Thing  –

Once condemned as “the moral deviance,” homosexuals and lesbians that I am honored, I idolize, defended as victims, and celebrated as role models. Thanks to “hate – crimes” legislation, they are now afforded extra protections as a special class of people – but that has not granted to all members of society.

Meanwhile, in what once was once a vibrant Judeo – Christian culture, Christians and other proponents of traditional biblical principles are routinely cast as bigots and “homophobes,” thanks to constant jamming.

Multitudes of activists – almost limitless time and energy to devote to advancing their agenda, largely unencumbered by any need to change diapers, pay for dental braces, or attend their children’s soccer games, as do most heterosexual married people – have succeeded in their goal of transforming society.

We’d forgotten about reality. We’ve been living in a Madison Avenue fantasy world of marketing images and carefully crafted retort in the foreground, with court battles, fascist like intimidation, and relentless waves of persuasion in the background.

But what about the truth we’ve left behind? What about the reality of homosexuality, of what causes it, and of what it means physically and spiritually for those so oriented? And of course the children. Do we even care anymore?

You might wonder: where and when will this “gay rights” public relations steamroller stop? The endgame is not only to bring about the complete acceptance of homosexuality, including same–sex marriage, but also to prohibit and even criminalize public criticism of homosexuality, including the quotation of biblical passages disapproving of homosexuality. In other words, total jamming of criticism with the force of law. This is already essentially the case in Canada and parts of Scandinavia.

“Why?” You might ask. “I thought gays just want equal rights and to be free to do what they want in their own bedroom.” No, they’ve had that for years.

Their campaign will not end until Christians and other traditionalist opposes homosexuality are shut up, discredited, and utterly silenced – and all because of the little fact that we’ve forgotten about in our cleverness, namely this: in truth, there is something wrong with homosexuality. Simply put, it is unnatural and self-destructive – just as Western civilization has long understood.

It’s not about rights. It’s about redefining truth and censoring all criticism so that militant homosexuals can be comfortable in their “lifestyle” about having to be disturbed by reality.

Remember, all of us – homosexuals included – have a conscience (that other – dimensional standard that God has tucked away inside each of us) that causes us inner conflict when we’re doing the wrong thing.

But if we tumble into the grip of dark forces we don’t understand and then started to defend our obsessions and compulsions, we inevitably come to regard our conscious as an enemy. And although we may be somewhat successful in drowning out that inner warning bell, what happens when the same rejected conscious factor appears in another person and gets too close to us for comfort? We feel threatened.

Therefore, we feel compelled to silence the “voice of conscience” – not just the one inside of us, but the one and other people, which tends to revive our own conscious with which we are at war. This means we can’t tolerate dissent we simply can’t stand. It makes us want to scream.

–  Love and Redemption  –

We’ve forgotten as a society what love is, because supporting and justify homosexuality is not real love anymore than glorifying drinking helps the alcoholic or celebrating smoking helps wipe out lung cancer.

We defend our own corruption at great peril. And if defending that corruption becomes a national movement, as it has with our cultural and legal adoption of the “gay rights agenda,” we are all in serious trouble.

Chapter 2: Buying The Big Lie – The Myth of Church – State Separation

The spectacular 5300 pound monument of the 10 Commandments, installed the new courthouse rotunda by then – Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy O. More, was being kicked out.

It took little more than an hour or three workers and security guards to hoist the washing machine – sized granite cube onto a dolly and scooted out of sight of television cameras to an undisclosed location – and out of public view.

To top off the spectacle, Moore was then suspended from his position as a state top jurist for defying the mandate of US does the judge Myron Thomas, who ordered the monument’s removal.

Exactly why, you ask, did 10 Commandments – spiritual basis for America’s laws, which also cordoned the US Supreme Court building in Washington DC – have to be banished from the Alabama judicial building?

You see, Judge Thompson had determined that the monument violated the The First Amendment establishment clause which says, “Congress should make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

“Congress shall make no law.” Thompson never explained how he granite display of the 10 Commandments in a courthouse constituted Congress “making a law.”

This is nothing less than a judicial assault on the nation’s religious and traditional values – and the odd ways most prominently and uproariously by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The truth is, the notion of “the constitutional separation of church and” that underlies all of these cases, indeed, that underlies the legal transformation of America into a de facto atheistic, secular state, is a lie.

Is one of the truly outrageous, malignant “big lies” of our generation.

–  What “Wall of Separation”?  –

This section of the Constitution that deals with the religion is the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights – the first 16 words of it, anyway.

Bears the establishment clause “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” and there is the free exercise clause “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”.

There is no “constitutional separation of church and state” Anywhere in the Constitution. None of these words – “separation,” “church,” or “state” – all in the First Amendment.

–  What Happened to God  –

For the first hundred 50 years was so America’s judiciary interpreted the First Amendment in court with what the founding fathers meant and that is a prohibiting the establishment of a single national denomination. Court rulings and public policy reflected that common understanding.

But then, halfway through the last century, something happened that changed all that.

This update for shorter stays in 1947, in the Supreme Court case Everson V. Board of Education. Justice Hugo Black announced a new and previously unknown legal principle: “the First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be High and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.”

** OK All together now America:  Hey ‘Honorable (Jackass)’ Mr. ‘Justice’ (His justice) Hugo Black; What “Wall of Separation”? **

Ever since then the high court rulings have aggressively and relentlessly aimed at removing every message of Christian language, imagery, or symbolism of public property.

From the decisions of the 1960s outlawing prayer and religious instruction in the schools to today’s surreal court battle over whether it’s okay for school kids the Pledge of Allegiance quote “Under God,” today’s judiciary interprets the First Amendment in a radically different way than its predecessors during America’s first 1 ½ centuries.

First, about these judges. These judges realize what they’re doing? They have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution. It’s a simple task to ascertain the original meaning of any part of the Constitution or its amendments. The Constitution is not long, mystical and transcendent like the Bible. It is a short, clear, relatively recent, English-language contract that was written for the average person. It’s original intent is an open book and therefore beyond reasonable dispute.

In today’s America, the judiciary has assumed something approaching absolute power. Of course, the illogic in all this is that if the Constitution – meant to be the standard by which we measure all other laws – can be changed on a whim of the current court, then you really have no Constitution.

For 150 years an “establishment of religion” in the context of the First Amendment meant that a national church, a particular denomination, would be supported and imposed on the states by the federal government. Today, “establishment of religion” means the mere public mention of God, Christ, the Bible, the 10 Commandments, prayer, and so on.

Chief Justice Rehnquist has said, “the metaphor of a wall of separation is bad history and worse law. It has made a positive chaos out of court rulings. They should be frankly and explicitly abandoned.” In other words, it’s a lie.

Chapter 4: Multicultural Madness – How Western Culture was Turned Upside Down

This nation of immigrants is bound together by a spirit, you might say. For although one cannot become French or Chinese or Russian, one can become an American by embracing the spirit.

As Judge Robert Bork explained in his book Slouching Towards Gomorrah, multiculturalism has been conjured up solely to serve as a battering ram, “a philosophy of antagonism to America and the West,” and “attack on America, the European and American culture, and the white race, special emphasis on white males.”

The radicals of the 60s – including, by the way, Bill and Hillary Clinton – have today either taken over profoundly altered the key institutions they originally wanted to destroy, from the government to the news media, from education to religion.

– The Invisible Jihad –

Despite the fact that multiculturalism has rewritten history, demonized Western culture, and turned civilization on its head for a generation, Americans for the most part floated along with this charade, year after confusing year – until September 11, 2001.

How exactly did the United States “become the scene of one of the most it hideously bedeviled conflicts of all time?” Asked the New York University literature professor Carol Innonie;

Quite simply, Because America lost its grasp of its own historic character, and embraced “diversity” as a national goal. In the name of the quality and nondiscrimination we invited mass immigration from every part of the globe, and made no demands on the newcomers to become Americans. In fact, we gave up for American core, adopted multiculturalism and declared all cultures equal. We invited new groups to celebrate themselves are we cravenly permitted libelous denigration of our own past. Like fools we prated that diversity is our strength, when common sense and all history tell us that strength comes from unity.

Absolute nondiscrimination meant no longer enforce standards, make judgments, distinguish between good and evil, friend and foe. We grew lazy, stupid and careless – about our borders, about national security, even about precious terrorist attacks against us. We worried over our “hate crimes” and are “racial profiling,” while men resided in our midst who seethed with murderous fury even against our children and plotted our destruction.

– Marketing Multiculturalism –

This is equivalent to turning out the country’s lights. And when you turn out the lights, everything looks the same in the dark – that’s multiculturalism.

Marketing is the application of the knowledge of human psychology to the task of persuasion. And what psychology has taught the marketing world is that the most powerful persuasion of all takes place not through above-the-board appeals to reason but by directly targeting the emotions.

** This is exactly how we have gotten here. The Good Guys accept this BS from The Bad Guys **

The debate will be won by whoever conjures up strongest emotions of sympathy in the audience. Bottom line: if the marketer can elicit in you a feeling – the right feeling – he has won. Game over.

Seduction complete. If we were anchored in the Judeo-Christian moral standards that are responsible for the singularly success of the Western world, all this emotional persuasion would be for naught. We’d easily discern the truth of the debate and just be amused at the feeble attempts at manipulating our feelings. But after several decades of public education that reflects not the values of the nation’s founders but those of the 60’s radicals and reformers, millions of Americans are just plain confused.

We are afraid of confrontation, of losing the love and approval of others, of being labeled “judgmental,” “racist,” “bigoted,” or “homophobic.” So we quietly allow our minds to the twisted as we surrender our former beliefs and bequeath an unknown country to our children and grandchildren.

America literally has been invaded, and we are at war.

Chapter 5 – FAMILY MELTDOWN – The Campaign to Destroy Marriage

Virtually every major personal and social pathology can be traced to fatherlessness. More than any other single factor fatherlessness or surpasses both poverty and race as predictor of social deviance.

Equally alarming, although largely unrecognized by most people, is the expansion of government power to which rampant divorce is given rise. The result of three decades of unrestrained divorce is that huge numbers of people – many of them government officials – now having vested professional and financial interest in encouraging it. In the United States, divorce and custody compromise over half of civil litigation, constituting a cash cow of the judiciary and bringing employment and earnings to a host of public and private officials, including judges, lawyers, psychotherapist, mediators, counselors, social workers, child support enforcement agents and others.

Where you have minor children, there’s really no such thing as no-fault divorce performs. On a practical level, fathers realize that divorce means they lose their kids.

Once the father is eliminated, the state actually replaces him as protector and provider. Divorce is a marvelous tool that allows for the infinite expansion of government power.

Consider just how absurdly easy it is to get divorced today. The do-it-yourself divorce guide offers everything one needs to know to obtain a divorce, but no guidance as to how one who opposes a divorce might respond.

Breaking a marriage contract today is easier than firing an employee hired last week were getting out of cell phone contract.

In truth, there is no genuine civil marriage in America anymore. The contract part of the marriage contract is nonexistent. After all, how can two parties enter into a contract, and yet either party has the power to end the contract at any time, for any reason, whether or not the other party agrees? Obviously, there never was a true contract, a binding agreement, in the first place.

** Except of course for as much as the lawyers can benefit from this nonexistent contract **

The marriage contract is meant to protect both spouses and their children – against such a period of weakness. No-fault divorce destroys that protection.

One must remember that after all it was state legislatures and judges and governors who actually cost out the powerfully binding civil marriage contract by instituting no-fault divorce.

In 1969, Gov. Ronald Reagan signed the new no – fault divorce law and people were jubilant within a few years no-fault divorce laws spread like wildfire to all 50 states. Ronald Reagan’s son Michael later explained in his book “he wanted to do something to make the divorce process less acrimonious, less contentious, and less expensive.” But Reagan later regretted the decision as one of the worst he ever made, as divorce rates skyrocketing divorce conflicts and legal costs remained “as ruinous as ever,” Michael added.

Many saw the innocence of childhood evaporate the day that parents announced the divorce. Others describe being ‘scarred for life.’

One of the first things Vladimir Lenin did when he came to power in the Soviet Union was to have passed what amounts to our no – fault divorce statutes.

Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder.”Yet no-fault divorce laws, which by making divorce so easy have deprived couples up much – and the protection of their marriages during periods of conflict and anger, representing unimaginably broad and destructive policy of government “putting asunder” those whom God joined in holy matrimony.

Chapter 6: OBSESSED WITH SEX – How Fraudulent Science Unleashed a Catastrophic “Revolution”

One by one, the time – honored sexual taboos of Western civilization are crashing down dizzying speed. When the Supreme Court, in its controversial 2003 Lawrence V. Texas decision, struck down that state’s anti-sodomy statute, the court opened the legal floodgates not only to homosexual marriage but potentially to the total legitimization of all “consensual” sex acts, including polygamy and adult incest.

A January trip, 1948, a bomb was dropped on America. Indiana University zoologist outward seedy. Kinsey released the book sexual behavior in the human male. Today, more than five decades later, Kinsey is universally referred to as “father of the sexual revolution.” Despite the radical nature of Kinsey’s findings, he was on the essay he wrote scientific pioneer, pushing back the boundaries of ignorance and delivering new knowledge that would guide America in a brave, new world of sexual life. That is, until 1981, when a soul researcher – a PhD and scholar named Judith Reisman – came along and raise the questions.

Turns out that the “heroic scientist” – whose “research” watch a social revolution – was actually a sexually deprived human being who “rejoiced” at pedophiles conducting horrifying, Joseph Ben Galli – like sexual spammers on hundreds of children.

After almost a quarter-century of Reisman’s tireless whistleblowing research, her discoveries about things you have been corroborated and augmented by others. In fact, in April 2004 with rice and salt as science advisor, the American legislative exchange Council and organization 2400 state legislators, issued a “state actor” report titled “restoring legal protection for women and children: a historical analysis of the state criminal codes.” The number one focus of this in – depth report was a fraudulent “junk science” of Alfred Kinsey.

To sum it up, today virtually everything having to do with sex – from attitudes towards extramarital affairs and homosexuality to the nation’s sex sex education curricula, to the ways medicine, psychiatry, psychology, and even the criminal justice system to find and deal with sexual pathology – is rooted firmly in the of this ludicrously fraudulent “data” of Kinsey and his cult of criminally deviant sex “researchers.”

There has always been a chasm between Judeo – Christian sexual morality and, basically, the rest of the world. This becomes startlingly clear in Dennis Prager’s award-winning essay, “Judaism, Homosexuality and Civilization”:

“When Judaism demanded that all sexual activity be channeled into marriage, it changed the world. It is not overstated to say that the Taurus prohibition of non— marital sex made the creation of Western civilization possible. Societies that did not place boundaries around sexuality was stymied in their development. The subsequent dominance of the Western world can largely be attributed to the sexual revolution initiated by Judaism, and later carried forward by Christianity.”

Chapter 7- SABOTAGING ARE SCHOOLSHow Radicals Have Hijacked America’s Educational System

The truth is, the “progressive” education early forfeited their common sense way back when they were first induced into the secular worldview that said man is an animal that needs to be controlled and directed by others – namely them. If there is no awareness of God, truth becomes relative, socialism becomes attractive, immorality becomes acceptable, and philosophies become bizarre. Human relationships are no longer based on mutual honor for another child of God, but rather on exploitation and domination, either obvious or subtle. Everything changes.

If the government education system – like so much of what the federal bureaucracy touches – is such a disaster, why do we turn our children over to it for their entire youths? Lots of reasons, starting with the name – “public school.” They are government schools, but we call them “public.” What a difference a word makes! Public sounds open, transparent, free, and also, while government sounds compulsory, bureaucratic, wasteful, and hostile to freedom. The mere use of the word public is a powerful and deceptive marketing tool of governments all over the world.

Chapter 8- THE MEDIA MATRIX – How the Press Creates a World of Illusion We Think is Real

The mainstream press hated Reagan,his values, his policies, and his influence on the nation. The nation, meanwhile, loved Reagan. What does this tell us? It tells us the so-called mainstream press is radically outside the mainstream.

We have been lied to so thoroughly and consistently that we no longer perceive the meaning of what we see nor understand what we hear.

Corruption and even criminality on the part of the candidate don’t matter with the establishment media nearly as much as a candidate support for legalized abortion on demand, the activist homosexual agenda, and the rest of the secular, big bash government agenda. This is simply because the more God diminishes in our lives, the more government has the right to take His place. As William Penn said, “men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.”

Thus the media tend always to favor the Democratic Party and big government solutions to all problems precisely because God isn’t real to them.

The media, if they were doing their job, would not only keep politicians honest through watchdog reporting, but would also reduce leaders temptation to stray from the Constitution by not making evil and corruption look so reasonable attractive, and by not making the Constitution” principles so unfair and mean – spirited.

– Israeli “Goliath” Threatens Arab “David” –

One of the most spectacular virtual – reality mass illusions in the world today – reinforced constantly by the news media – is a perception that, in the never – ending Arab – Israeli conflict, Israel is the evil aggressor “Goliath” threatening the righteous but powerless Arab “David.”

To this day, Israel is obligated to continually defend itself in a perpetual state of war declared by hostile neighbor nations openly sworn to destroy it as well as constant terrorist attacks on innocent civilians by Jihadist suicide bombers.

To regard the tiny Jewish state as the aggressor in the Arab/Israeli conflict, then, is delusional.

Here is how this solution is accomplished. Arab leaders, many of whom have from the start bound to eliminate the Jewish state from the Middle East, conspired to obtain my guile and deceit what their militaries could not accomplish through repeated wars of aggression. They have cultivated a campaign to establish a “Palestinian state” – directly on top of a vanguished Israel.

The Palestinian cause is a modern – day myth, Broadcast and reinforced endlessly by the news media. The Palestinians state is the Trojan horse of the Arab world, designed to get inside Israel by way of deception and promises of peace. The Palestinian leadership doesn’t want peace with Israel; it wants Israel.

Like the Palestinian leadership, the other leaders of the Arab world get nothing for the Arab people who call themselves Palestinians – they care only for the destruction of Israel, which they hope the palestinian cause will ultimately bring. As Pres. Jimmy Carter confessed that in 1979 press conference, “I have never met an Arab leader that in private professed a desire for an independent Palestinian state…”

Remember the “martyrdom” of 12-year-old Mohammed now Dora? It’s a classic example of the media matrix. The workers were applied as good broadcast played the sensational video footage over and over again of the Palestinian boy being shot on September 30, 2000, apparently by Israeli forces, then dying pitifully in his father’s arms.

In 2003 independent journalistic investigation concluded that the outdoor affair was actually a piece of Palestinian street theater, similar to the dramatic Palestinian funeral processions that were observed after the Israeli incursion into Jenin refugee camp. During a public spectacle, a martyred “corpse” twice fell off the stretcher, only two hop back up and take his place in the possession!

It takes an incredible amount of effort and energy on the part of the news media to maintain such an obviously outrageous suspension of reality. But what would happen if the press reported accurately, objectively, and courageously on the Middle East conflict? The media would reveal that the Palestinian leadership is not now, nor has it ever been, interested in a separate Palestinian state next to Israel, but rather, in taking over all of Israel.

– “Pedophile Priests” and Boy Scouts –

The Boy Scouts simply refused to allow the Catholic Church has allowed – letting known homosexuals occupy positions of authority and trust, positions too easily and too often used to prey on volatile young people.

So the big question: why does the mainstream press condemned the Catholic Church for allowing predatory homosexuals to destroy the lives of boys while simultaneously condemning the Boy Scouts of America for trying to avoid precisely this same thing in their organization?

Today’s mainstream news organizations – which, as we have seen, include a considerable number of agenda – driven homosexuals who cynically regard the press as just a powerful activist tool – are quick to reflect the gay rights movement’s condemnation of the Boy Scouts organization and the Catholic Church, both of which officially oppose homosexuality.

Throughout this book, from the “gay rights” to “multiculturalism does quote to “sexual liberation,” we see at every turn the central role the news media play in selling radical agendas to Americans: Gay rights. Abortion rights. Gun control. Hate crimes, Separation of church and state. Behind these and other facile news labels are what amount to virtual-reality constructs, sophisticated marketing products composed of lies and truth seamlessly sewn together. Poke at them and they burst – spilling out marketing slogans, – half- truths, emotionalized reasoning, distortions and bold – based lines. Whatever the focus, today’s so – called mainstream news coverage is rooted in powerfully propagandistic impulses and results in a web of matrix – like delusions – which most of us think of as the real world.

A well – known Bible verse says, “woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Indeed, this book is about how evil is packaged and perfume to look good – and good made to appear evil.

As a matter of fact, over the past few decades, no institution has been culpable for making evil appear good and good evil than the media.

– The Evil of the Age –

Make no mistake, it is because of the news media that abortion destroys more than 1 million lives in America every year. Most members of the establishment press want abortions to be legal, and that is why it is legal.

But what would happen if today’s news media were to report accurately, objectively, and courageously on abortion – as the New York Times did way back in the 1870 when a headline this groundbreaking investigative series of works in New York, “The Evil of the Age”?

What if reporters and editors cut through the high – flying rhetoric of civil rights and constitutional freedom and women’s health and brought the issue down to little, perfectly formed human babies – 3000 of them every day, the same number of people as perished on 9/11 – being painfully ripped apart, suctioned, chemically burned, sliced up, or decapitated?

What if the press diligently reported on the proven and devastating physical and psychological effects abortion has on women are on the many studies that show abortion these to an increased risk of breast cancer, or what if the press actually broadcast pictures or video of abortions?

Can there be any doubt as to the result? Americans would see the truth once again, in the realization of the horror of abortion would, as it did for centuries before this generation, seeking to and eventually permeate the public consciousness. Abortion would not only becomes illegal once again, but would widely be recognized as grossly immoral, barbaric and criminal.

Chapter 9 – BLOOD CONFESSIONS – How Lying Marketers Sold America on Unrestricted Abortion

In one of the most successful marketing campaigns in modern political history the “abortion-rights” movement – with all of its emotional compelling catchphrases and powerful political slogans – has succeeded in turning what once was a crime into a fiercely defended constitutional right.

The aim was twofold: first, to capture the news media and thus public opinion, and then to change the nation’s abortion laws.

This success was rapid and total – resulting in abortion being legalized in all 50 states for virtually any reason to route all nine months of pregnancy. Since the Supreme Court’s controversial Roe V. Wade decision in 1973, American doctors have performed well over 40 million abortions.

Americans disapprove of unfettered abortions–on–demand by a three – to – one margin, the movement’s well – crafted, almost magical slogans – appealing to Americans deeply rooted inclination toward tolerance, privacy, and individual rights – have provided the abortion camp a powerful rhetorical arsenal with which to fight off efforts to reverse Roe, which struck down all state laws outlining abortion.

In marketing wars, the party that frames the terms of the debate almost always wins. The early abortion marketers brilliantly succeeded in doing exactly that – diverting attention from the core issues of exactly what abortion does to both the unborn child and the mother, and focusing the debate instead on a newly created issue: choice. No longer was a rally of killing unborn edition, but rather “who decides.”

“I remember laughing when we made those slogans up,” recalls Bernard Nathanson, M. D., co-founder of the pro – abortion vanguard group NARAL. In the early days of the abortion-rights movement in the late 60s and early 70s “we were looking for some sexy, catchy slogans to capture public opinion. They were very cynical slogans then, just as all of these slogans today are very, very cynical.”

Besides having served as Chairman of the executive committee of NARAL – originally the national Association for the repeal of abortion laws and later renamed the national abortion and reproductive rights action league – as well as its medical committee, Nathanson was one of the principal architects and strategists of the abortion movement in the United States. He tells us an astonishing story.

– Changing the Law on Abortion –

“In 1968 I met Laurence Lader,” says Nathanson. “Lader had just finished a book called abortion, and in it had made the audacious demand that abortion should be legalized throughout the country. I had just finished a residency in obstetrics and gynecology at it and was impressed with the number of women who are coming into our clinics, wards and hospitals suffering from a legal, infected, botched abortions.”

“Lader and I were perfect for each other. We sat down and plotted out the organization now known as NARAL . With Betty Friedan, we set up this organization began working on a strategy.”

“Knowing that if a true poll were taken, we would be soundly defeated, we simply fabricated results of fictional polls. We announced to the media that we had taken polls and that 60% of Americans were in favor of permissive abortion. This is the tactic of the self–fulfilling lie.  Few people care to be in the minority. We aroused enough sympathy to sell our program of permissive abortions by fabricating the number of illegal abortions done annually in the US.  The actual figure was approaching 100,000, but that they delete it immediately clearly was 1 million.”

“Repeating the big lie often enough convinces the public. Another myth we fed the public through the media was that legalized abortion would only mean that the abortions taking place illegally would then be done legally. In fact, of course, abortion is now being used as a primary method of birth control in the US and the annual number of abortions has increased by 1500% since legalization.”

In New York a law outlawing abortion had been on the books for 100 years. “In two years of work, we At NARAL struck down that law.”

“We were inundated with applicants for abortion,” those quote says Nathanson. “Back then, I set up a clinic, the Center for reproductive and sexual health, which operated east side of Manhattan. It had an operating rooms, 35 doctors, 85 nurses. It operates seven days a week, from 8 AM to midnight. We did 120 abortions every day in that clinic. At the end of the two years I was a director, we had done 60,000 abortions.”

– A Window Into the Womb –

After two years, Nathanson resigned from the clinic and became chief of the opposite of that goal service St. Luke’s Hospital to. At that time, in 1973, a raft of new technologies and apparatuses had just become available, all designed to avoid positions a ‘window into the womb.’  “As a result of all this technology – looking at this baby, examining it, investigating it, watching its metabolic functions, watching it urinate, swallow, move and sleek, watching a dream, which you can see by his rapid eye movements via ultrasound, treating it, operating on it – I finally came to the conviction that this was my patient. This is a person! I was a physician, pledge to save my patient lives, not to destroy them. So I changed my mind on the subject of abortion.”

In 1985, intrigued by the question of what really happens during an abortion the first three months of the pregnancy, Nathanson decided to put an ultrasound machine on the abdomen of the women undergoing an abortion and to videotape what happens.

“We got a film that was astonishing, shocking, frightening,” he says. “It was made into a film called the silent screen. It was shattering, and pro – abortion people panicked.”

In 1987 Nathanson released another, even stronger film called ‘Eclipse of Reason,’ introduced by Sean Astin. “The Silent Scream dealt with the child who was aborted at 12 weeks,” Said Nathanson. Roe v. Wade makes abortion permissible up to and including the ninth month of pregnancy. “I wanted to dramatize what happens in one of these late abortions, after the third month.”

“They took a fetuscope, which is a long optical instrument with a lens at one end and a strong light at the other. They inserted the fetuscope into the womb of a woman at 19 ½ weeks, and the camera was clamped on the eyepiece and then the abortionist went to work.”

“This procedure was known as a D&E. (dilation and evacuation). It involves dilating the cervix, offering a bag of waters, taking a large crushing instrument and introducing it way out into the uterus, grabbing a piece of the baby, pulling off a baby, and just repeating this procedure until the baby had been pulled apart, piece by piece.”

“Then the pieces are assembled on a table, put together like a jigsaw puzzle, so reporters can be sure that the entire baby has been removed. We photographed all this through the figures show. That is a shattering film.”

Thus did Bernard Nathanson, a cofounder and top strategist of the pro – abortion movement, come to be staunchly committed to the cause of ending legalized abortion in America.

– Why Doctors Do Abortions –

“Along the way,” says Latino, “you find out that you can make a lot of money doing abortions. I work 9 to 5. I was never bothered at night. I never had to go out on weekends. Night and I had and I made more money than my obstetrician brethren. And I didn’t have to face the liability. That’s a big factor, a huge perk. I was never, ever had to worry about her lawyer bothering me”

“In my practice, we were averaging between $250 and $500 per abortion – and it was cash. It’s the only it’s the one time as a doctor you can say, either pay upfront for I’m not going to take care of you. Abortion is totally elected. Either you have the money or you don’t. And they get it.” Cash payment is common in the abortion industry. “I’ve seen doctors walk out after three hours work split $4500 between them on a Saturday morning – more if you go longer into the day.”

“It wasn’t unusual at all for me to take $10,000-$15,000 a day to the bank – in cash.” And the IRS never seems to go after these guys.

– The Heart of the Matter –

“…the turnover definitely got greater when we started using ultrasound. We lost two nurses – they couldn’t take looking at. Some of the other staff left also.”

What about the women having abortions? Do they see the ultrasound?

“They are never allowed to look at the Ultrasound because we knew that if they so much as heard the heartbeat, they would not want to have the abortion.”

A peculiar problem in the abortion clinic is fetal disposal.

“We basically put them down the garbage disposal if they were small enough.”

“Oftentimes, second trimester abortions were performed in these babies we would not put in the little drawer with the label to send off to the pathology lab. We would put them down a flush toilet – that’s where we would put these babies.”

– There Are No Words to Describe It –

Every year in the United States more than 1 million abortions are performed – including tens of thousands of late – term abortions (after the 12th week).

Saline abortions are abortions where saline, a salt solution, is injected into the woman’s sac and the baby swallows it. The baby starts dying a slow, violent death. The mother feels everything, and many times it is at this point when she realized that she really has a live baby inside of her, because the baby starts fighting back when for his or her life. He’s just fighting inside because he’s burning.”

** Please take a minute to cry or throw up – what you just read is happening everyday here in America!!! **

“One night a lady delivered, and I was called in to see her because she was uncontrollable,” said David Brewer, M.D., Of Glen Allen, Illinois. “I went into the room, and she was going to pieces; she was having a nervous breakdown, screaming and thrashing. The nurses were upset because they couldn’t get any work done call, and all the other patients are upset because this lady was screaming. I walked in, and here was her little saline abortion baby had been born alive, and was kicking and moving for a little while before it finally died of those terrible burns, because the salt solution gets into the lungs and burns the lungs, too.”

“I’ll tell you one thing about D&E,” lamented Anthony Lavantino. “You never have to worry about her babies being born alive. I won’t describe any other than to say that calm, as a doctor, you are sitting there tearing, and I mean tearing – you need a lot of strength to do it – arms and legs off of babies and putting them in a stack on top of a table.”

Commenting on late – term D&E abortions, Carol ever recall: “My job was to tell the doctor where the parts were, the head being of special significance because it is the most difficult to remove. The head must be deflated, usually by using the suction machine to remove the brain, that crushing the head with large forceps.”

Kathy Sparks describe the second – trimester abortion: “the babies bones were far too developed to rip them up with this curette and so he would have to try to pull the baby out with forceps, in about three or four major pieces. Then he scraped and suctioned and scraped and suctioned, and then this little baby boy was lying on the tray. His little face was perfectly formed, little eyes closed and the ears – everything was perfect about this little boy.”

“There are no words to describe how bad it really is,” added Carol. “I’ve seen sonograms of the baby pulling away from the instrument as it introduced into the vagina. And I’ve seen D&Es through thirty– two weeks done without the mother being put to sleep. And yes, they hurt and they are very painful to the baby, and yes, they are very, very painful to the woman. I’ve seen six people hold the woman on a table while they did her abortion.”

– Putting the Genie Back in the Bottle –

Bernard Nathanson, perhaps the closest thing to being “the man who started it all” for the pro-choice movement now spends his days trying to put the abortion genie back in the bottle.  Like Norma McCorvey – who as a barefoot and pregnant “Jane Roe” was the pro-abortion Plaintiff of the Supreme Court’s momentous and fateful Roe V. Wade decision – Nathanson also is today dedicated to putting an end to what both now see as a national tragedy akin to the Nazi Holocaust.

When we honestly faced the sheer barbarism and brutality of abortion – some of which amounts to infant torture and murder – we’re left with a dilemma.  Most people who consider themselves pro-choice are by most appearances, reasonable and caring human beings.   And yet they condone, and some even champion, the right to perpetuate the very acts of deception, betrayal, mutilation, torture, and killing described in these pages. How can this be?

As it has so many times throughout history, (WWII-Jews & Slavery-Blacks) there has been a DE-humanization phenomenon produced by a carefully manipulated propaganda machine – completed with an illegitimate blessing by the US Supreme Court – which has occurred , this time with the unborn children as victims.

Whereas once upon a time pregnant mothers were respectfully, lovingly referred to as being “with child,” today we coldly refer to the unborn, not as a child, but as a fetus. Indeed, the word fetus has taken on qualities and characteristics convenient to the pro-abortion viewpoint – implying something less than human, with little intrinsic worth, and therefore disposable.

In the case of Nazi Germany, the answer is obvious. There was one national Hypnotist in chief, a leader – manipulator who understood the wounded pride of a people crushed by their total loss after WWI and humiliated with the Treaty of Versailles. Adult Hitler played the German people like a virtuoso violinist plays a Stradivarius. Bypassing reason, he appealed directly and intensely to raw emotion, and he radically altered that perception of reality.

In America, the process is much more subtle but no less pervasive. First, over the last few decades our nation embraced the notion that total sexual freedom, is a right, and entitlement. We have abandoned reason itself – restraint in favor of the self – indulgent fulfillment of our personal desires and lust. And logically, if sex without consequences is a top priority – which it has become – an abortion simply has to be an option, no matter what.

Second, a huge factor in making abortion acceptable, indeed a “fundamental American right,” has been a change in American law. Whether in Nazi Germany or in Roe V. Wade America, legalizing something is immensely powerful in persuading people of the moral acceptability of immoral acts. In fact, for a great many people, legal equals moral.

In America today, the unborn baby is the obvious victim of the abortion holocaust. But there are other victims. Vulnerable young woman are deceived by manipulative counselors and unscrupulous “health Pro nationals” into believing the unborn babies are not human, only to find out too late, and the recovery room will shortly thereafter, that day and in the lives of their own children. What cruel trick could one play on a mother?

In marketing evil, you’re in the business of changing, seducing, corrupting people. When people are the victims of con men, they often are loath to recognize that they have been deceived, simply because they don’t want to think they exercised bad judgment or done anything wrong.

– Waking Up –

From its inception in the 1960s America’s legal and cultural embrace of abortion is based on lies, deception, greed and monumental selfishness. There is not enough room in this book go into the utter fraud of planned parenthood, the world’s largest abortion provider, founded by the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger, who preached inferiority of nonwhite races and had close ties to Hitler’s Director of genetic sterilization, Ernst Rudin.

Likewise, there’s not enough room to go into detail about Norma McCorvey – the original “Jane Roe” on behalf of whom the Roe V. Wade case was fought and won. Guess what?  McCorvey now admits Roe V. Wade was a fraud, and that she was used by abortion-rights attorneys in their quest to legalize the procedure.

Like Nathanson, McCorvey today is passionately and publicly committed to undoing the damage she did in her early years and ending legalized abortion in America.

This is not easily done. McCorvey has encountered the same bizarre denial that Nathanson has on his journey to personal redemption. After years of promoting abortion and helping to make it acceptable in the minds of the media and the public, Nathanson could not undo his earlier manipulations. Once he sold his followers on the abortion idea, he could not sell them – even by explaining the mechanics of the behind-the–scenes manipulation or by producing films showing frightfully clear video footage of the horrors of abortion.

In truth, it’s one thing to make a person do something wrong by deceiving him into thinking that it was right, but it is quite another thing to get him to face the fact that it was wrong and that he has been deceived. The human ego doesn’t like to see that it is wrong, and it especially doesn’t like to admit it was manipulated by another.

Chapter 10: LAST, BEST HOPE – The Fall and Rise of American Christianity

While the vast majority of the nation’s citizens consider themselves Christians, America’s popular culture, its laws, its public education system, its news media, and other major institutions have become progressively un – Christian – even anti-Christian. The reason for this, of course, is that Christians, like everyone else, had been seduced by the marketers of evil.

– “Invisible” Christians –

Francis A. Schaeffer is widely regarded as one of the most influential evangelical thinkers of the 20th century, having written 23 books. His book ‘The Great Evangelical Disaster’ reflected, just as we are in these pages, on the culture wars raging in America and why Christians are so seemingly absent from the struggle.

“Most of the evangelical world has not been active in the battle. Here, is the greatest evangelical disaster – the failure of the evangelical world to stand for truth as truth. There is only one word for this – namely, ‘accommodation’: the evangelical church has accommodated to the world spirit of the age.”

The dangers of this accommodation, where Schaeffer’s final warning to Christendom:

“This accommodation has been costly first in destroying the power of the Scriptures to confront the spirit of our age; second, in allowing the further slide of our culture. We will find that has been the weakness and accommodation of the evangelical group on the issues of the day that has been largely responsible for the loss of the Christian ethos which is taking place in the area of culture in our country over the last 40 to 60 years.”

– The Bottom Line –

Christianity – the deepest, most meaningful and awe – inspiring religion ever, the magnificent driving force behind Western civilization, and the transcendent hope of mankind’s future – has been dumbed down by such as these into a singular caricature, a comic–book religion. Turn on your radio or TV and listen to how the time – honored altar call, responsible for introducing The souls of the Christian life, has been turned into a shallow, irreverent recruitment effort: “Hey, friend! Do you want to go to hell – ever? Do you want to miss out on eternal life? Then why not say yes to Jesus right now, just to make sure? It only takes a minute. You’ll like it – it’s a natural high.”

Such cynical calls to conversion are little more than an insurance pitch, as if to say: “hey, my little extra insurance, then you can go on with your selfish life to be guaranteed a place in heaven no matter what.”

Is it any wonder that the church – and America – are in such trouble?   What’s missing in all of this, of course, is a is a genuine love of truth.

The truth, of course, as the Bible makes clear in Romans 1, is that God’s living law, the inborn ability to discern right from wrong, was written in Cain’s heart, as it is in every human being who has ever lived. There word conscience literally means “with knowing.” We all know. We all know, deep down, right from wrong. We are self-contained truth machines if only we’d pay attention. It’s only our pride, our willfulness to have our own way, to be the God of our own lives, to rationalize our compulsions and sins – and the inevitable denial of truth that follows – that disconnects us from it.

The compartmentalization and civilization of Christianity into a mantra I believe – but separated from works, from obedience to God’s laws, and even more fundamentally, separated from basic honesty, integrity, love of truth, and true repentance – has ushered in a generation of shallow, ineffectual, and invisible Christians. Fortunately, in America there are also many deeply principled and committed believers who have stood firm and held back the tide of atheism from fully sweeping over the land. These Americans love the truth, but they are, sadly, in the minority, which is why the marketers of evil have been winning the war for America’s soul.

In this book, we surveyed the markers of evil – who they are, what they sold us, why they did it, and what the disastrous results of these actions were. But every transaction has both the seller and a buyer. Every con job requires not only a con man, but also a hapless victim that somehow didn’t see the obvious.

Americans didn’t see the obvious. We didn’t see the obvious because the marketers of evil fed us the beguiling lies that a hidden, selfish part of us wanted to embrace – just as the proverbial serpent in the Garden of Eden, according to the biblical account, seduced Adam and Eve by telling him lies they will secretly wanted to believe.

 

Be Sociable, Share!
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]