Planning obligations can be met either by the conclusion of a unilateral undertaking, in which the owner/developer unilaterally agrees to contribute financially to various infrastructure requirements, or by entering into a legal agreement s106 concluding a multilateral agreement between all parties (. B for example, owner/developer, Dacorum Borough Council, Hertfordshire County Council). Most planning obligations are by appointment and are called Section 106 of the agreement. Planning obligations must relate to a specific area in a plan or map assigned to the commitment. If the Development Management Committee decides to grant the building permit subject to an Article 106 agreement: in the case of a Section 52 agreement or an old-style agreement (this is an agreement reached before October 25, 1991), the only option is to ask the regional court to discharge or amend a restrictive contract under Section 84 of the Property Rights Act 1925. This procedure is not specifically focused on agreement planning. The regional court may lighten or amend a restrictive contract if the restriction is obsolete due to changes in the nature of the land or neighbourhood or other circumstances of the land; If its existence prevents a reasonable user of the land; or if the modification or discharge is not detrimental to the beneficiaries. Ask the seller for evidence confirming that all relevant planning obligations have been met. If there is no evidence or if there are restrictive competition obligations in place that are at odds with the proposed remedy, you should consider making the transaction dependent on the changes. Where the local planning authority has issued a subsequent building permit incompatible with a limitation in an agreement under Section 52, this is generally a good indication of the Authority`s willingness to enter into an amendment or discharge agreement. On the contrary, if the local planning authority is not prepared to change the situation, it is likely to indicate that it believes that the restrictions contained in the agreement still serve a valid planning objective. In such a situation, a buyer must reconsider all development proposals that are related to restrictive obligations (for example. B in terms of use) in the existing planning agreement or the obligations are taken into account in the price of the land.

The third option is to use the legislative powers to terminate the agreement. Such jurisdiction is provided for in Section 120, Point 4 of the Planning Act 2008, which provides that a “Development Consent Order” (DCO) may provide for all matters listed in Part 1 of Schedule 5, including “repeal or modification of land agreements.” While we are not aware of any instances where this power has been used so far in COOs, we believe it is increasingly being used to modify or remove the restrictions contained in planning agreements. So how do you lighten up an old planning contract? When a planning request requires agreement on the planning obligation under section 106, the applicant or agent is notified as soon as possible, usually during the pre-application phase, provided that a pre-nomination notice has been requested. Mandatory Notifications and Certificates Part 1 (PDF 49.6 KB) – Publication of an application to amend or implement a planning obligation under Section 106 bis of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The procedure for unloading a Section 106 agreement is detailed in TCPA 1990, s 106A. This procedure has The first option requires a request for discharge or modification of a restrictive federal state in accordance with Section 84 of the Property Act 1925. The Supreme Court may lighten or amend a restrictive pact if it is satisfied that one of the following reasons applies: planning applications that require section 106 agreements are decided by the Development Management Committee.

Be Sociable, Share!