- The Bottom Line -
The election of 2012 is one of the easiest in history to call. This election is not about 'who', it is about 'how'. Obama and the Democrats will lose by a landslide: UNLESS THEY CHEAT.
With the 2012 presidential campaign upon us, it is impressive to see how the TV pundits can ramble on and on and on without even coming up for air! When it comes to most TV political pundits; their sole purpose in life is to show you and me just how 'intellectual and brilliant' they are. (The exception to the rule is Dick Morris.)
How's that old saying go: "Dazzle em with bullshit…."
Until the election comes in November, these pundits will be 'dazzling' us 24/7 with the 'whos and whys' of the presidential election. Thank God once again for my TIVO and my 'JAE'; Jack Ass Eliminator (the Fast Forward on the Tivo remote).
The election of 2012 is one of the easiest in history to call. This election is not about 'who', it is about 'how'.
Obama and the Democrats will lose by a landslide – UNLESS THEY CHEAT. Obama and his thugs know this and you can bet they are devoting most of their time not on a campaign strategy, but on how they can rig the vote count. (To all the 'good guys': I know. "Not in America. They could never get away with it." And your right. They will not get away with it BUT, and this is what they know and are counting on: by time the evidence comes out and is prosecuted, Obama will be long gone from his second term and the damage he inflicted will be done…)
So the 'how' is how it is won. Either a fair election in which case Romney wins big or a rigged election in which case Obama inches by and wins.
Here's the simple math on why in an honest election Romney wins by a landslide:
Election results of 2008: Obama wins by a 7% margin over McCain. Now take the number of voters who voted for Obama simply because THEY wanted to be among the first ever to vote for a 'black' President; the 'Vanity' vote.
(To show how vain and stupid they were, Obama's not even 'black', but that's a whole different conversation.) Of course we need to guess what percentage this is since most of these idiots would never admit it. (Except for Samuel L. Jackson who was at least honest about his prejudice and intent – (See The Face of Racism – The Video) So let's take a very conservative guess about the 'vanity' vote and put the number at a mere 10%. This includes all ethnicities including the 'white' vote.
This 10% vanity vote will not be there because it will no longer be 'historical' to vote for a 'black' guy.
This time around Obama has a track record. And after 3 years of failures and arrogance, here's just a short list of the 'dispossessed' by Obama: Those who are against Obamacare; about 75% of Americans. The people who are suffering because of the economy. The religious and traditional Americans that are against homosexual weddings and homosexuals in the military. The patriots who know that Islam is the enemy and that Obama whenever possible supports them. All of the electorate that can recognize an honest man from a liar. All citizens who love America, American exceptionalism and the American spirit. And of course all people who know from history that all forms of socialist governments always have and always will fail.
Let's make it simple. Let's forget about all the perceived or known Obama negatives in the above paragraph. Just take away the vanity vote which is no longer in play. Now do the math:
Obama Election 2008 = 52.9% - Opponent 2008 Election (McCain) 45.7% Vanity Vote = - 10% + 10%
So in 2012 just without the vanity vote, Obama loses 42.9% to Romney's 55.7%. Now add back in all the perceived or known Obama negatives in the above paragraph and the result is a Romney landslide. It's simple math and an obvious outcome; Unless…
Here's Dick Morris' take:
A Romney Landslide
If the election were held today, Mitt Romney would win by a landslide.
The published polls reflect a close race for two reasons:
1. They poll only registered voters, not likely voters. Rasmussen is the only pollster who tests likely voters, and his latest tracking poll has Romney ahead by 48-43.
2. As discussed in previous columns, a study of the undecided voters in the past eight elections in which incumbents sought a second term as president reveals that only Bush-43 gained any of the undecided vote. Johnson in ’64, Nixon in ’72, Ford in ’76, Carter in ’80, Reagan in ’84, Bush in ’92 and Clinton in ’96 all failed to pick up a single undecided vote.
So when polls show President Obama at 45 percent of the vote, they are really reflecting a likely 55-45 Romney victory, at the very least.
Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers yesterday, and the results should have 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue very worried. If President Obama carries only those states where he had a net positive approval rating in 2011 (e.g. Michigan where he is up 48 percent to 44 percent), Obama would lose the 2012 election to the Republican nominee 323 electoral votes to 215.
Read The Complete Post at