– MY TAKE –
– The Muslim President strikes again! – This man could ONLY be a counter-terrorism adviser to someone who doesn’t want terrorism countered! And by the way, how did this jackass ever even get pass elementary school?
John Brennan : “Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, …”
Oh Really Mr. Brennan? Then I guess this was a ‘legitimate purification’ of lower manhattan:
So once again ‘you can take it to the bank; these liberals will only start to understand our enemy when they are at the morgue identifying pieces of THEIR FAMILIES.
Here’s the report from Bob Ellis
How safe can the American people be when one of the key people entrusted to defend us from threats is himself utterly blind to those threats?
Posted by Bob Ellis on May 27,2010 at The Dakota Voice.
Fox News reports John Brennan, President Barack Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, during a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies
described violent extremists as victims of “political, economic and social forces,” but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in “religious terms.”
So these terrorists are just victims of “political, economic and social forces.” More of the tired and utterly disproved liberal blather about how certain people have no choice but to engage in crime and kill other people because they are poor.
Notice also that this idiot says we must not describe the terrorist attacks by these terrorists in religious terms…even though the terrorists themselves describe their actions in religious terms. Who among us have not heard virtually without exception these terrorists referring to their jihad, and that they are blowing themselves and others up for Allah.
Brennan’s psychobabble double-talk only gets deeper
He repeated the administration argument that the enemy is not “terrorism,” because terrorism is a “tactic,” and not terror, because terror is a “state of mind” — though Brennan’s title, deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism and homeland security, includes the word “terrorism” in it. But then Brennan said that the word “jihad” should not be applied either.
“Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children,” Brennan said.
Read Complete Post at